Macha

Macha Credits Explained — How AI Agent Billing Works

Macha Team

Written by

Macha Team

Last edited June 12, 2026

Zendesk Expert Reviewed

Verified

Macha doesn't bill per seat or per ticket — it bills in credits, and the model is simpler than most usage-based pricing once you know the two rules. Understanding it takes about two minutes, and it changes how you build agents cost-effectively.

Macha Credits Explained — How AI Agent Billing Works

Watch the quick explainer

Rule 1: one credit charge per complete response

Every time an agent generates a complete response, it uses credits — once. Not per tool call, not per step in its instructions, not per message it reads. The whole back-and-forth an agent does to handle a request — read the ticket, search knowledge, call a tool, decide, reply — is billed as a single response.

That's a big deal, because it means a complex agent that uses five tools to resolve a ticket costs the same as a simple one that just replies: one response. You're paying for outcomes the agent produces, not for how hard it worked to get there.

Rule 2: the cost depends on the model

How many credits a response costs is set entirely by the model you've chosen for that agent. Lighter, faster models cost less; stronger models cost more. Here's the full table:

ProviderModelCredits / response
OpenAIGPT-5.4 Mini (default)1
OpenAIGPT-53
OpenAIGPT-5.45
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.59
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 49
GroqLlama 3.3 70B1
GroqLlama 3.1 8B0.5
GroqMixtral 8×7B0.5

So a response can cost anywhere from 0.5 to 9 credits depending on which model you pick — your call, based on the task. You set the model per agent on its configuration screen.

Every agent shows its model and per-message credit cost right in the config (here, the Runbook Writer on GPT-5 — 3 credits / message).
Every agent shows its model and per-message credit cost right in the config (here, the Runbook Writer on GPT-5 — 3 credits / message).

What this means in practice

For most Zendesk workflows — triaging tickets, drafting replies, summarizing content, updating fieldsGPT-5.4 Mini at 1 credit per response is all you need. It's fast, affordable, and handles those tasks well, which makes it the right default for high-volume support operations.

You step up to a stronger model only when the work demands it. An agent with a long, detailed set of instructions and many steps to remember will do better on GPT-5 (3 credits) — strong quality at a reasonable cost — or one of the premium models for genuinely hard reasoning. The point is you match the model to the task instead of paying premium rates for simple work.

How credits come in your plan

Each plan includes a monthly pool of credits:

  • Starter — $299/mo, 3,000 credits.
  • Professional — $699/mo, 10,000 credits.
  • Enterprise — unlimited.

Credits reset each billing cycle, and if you need more mid-cycle, one-time top-up packs are available (they don't expire). One more thing worth knowing: **indexing your knowledge — building embeddings for your sources — is not charged against credits.** You only spend credits when an agent actually responds.

Keeping costs predictable

Because cost is "responses × the model's rate," there are exactly two levers:

  1. Pick the right model per agent. This is the big one. A high-volume triage agent on GPT-5.4 Mini (1 credit) instead of a premium model (9 credits) is a 9× difference for work that doesn't need it.
  2. Watch your volume. More responses = more credits. Agent Analytics shows you which agents are generating the most responses and on which models, so you can right-size.

Unlike a per-resolution meter that climbs with every ticket, a credit plan is a fixed monthly pool — so you always know your ceiling.

A worked example: what a busy month costs

Put real numbers on it. Say a support team automates 2,000 ticket actions a month — triage, summaries, and replies — all on GPT-5.4 Mini at 1 credit each. That's 2,000 credits, comfortably inside Professional's 10,000 credits. Swap a few hundred of those to GPT-5 (3 credits) for one complex agent and you're still well under the pool.

Now compare that to a per-resolution tool charging ~$1 per outcome on the same 2,000 actions — that's $2,000, and it climbs every month volume rises. The credit model's advantage isn't just the unit cost; it's the predictability: you're drawing from a fixed monthly pool, the cheap default model stretches it a long way, and a heavy month doesn't blow up your bill. The two levers — model choice and volume — are both visible and in your control.

Frequently asked questions

How are Macha credits charged? Once per complete AI response — not per tool call or per step. The amount depends on the model the agent uses.

How much is a response? 0.5 to 9 credits depending on the model; the default (GPT-5.4 Mini) is 1.

Does using more tools cost more? No — a response that uses several tools still counts as one response.

Is indexing my knowledge base charged? No — embedding and indexing your sources isn't billed; only agent responses use credits.

What if I run out mid-month? Buy a top-up pack (they don't expire), or your pool resets at the next billing cycle.

Which model should I default to? GPT-5.4 Mini (1 credit) for most support workflows; step up to GPT-5 for complex, multi-step agents.

The bottom line

Macha billing is two rules: one charge per complete response, at a rate set by the model. Default your agents to GPT-5.4 Mini for everyday support work, reserve stronger models for genuinely complex agents, and your credits stretch a long way — on a predictable monthly pool rather than a meter that grows with every ticket.

See it for yourself: start free and watch how few credits real workflows use. 7-day free trial, no credit card required. Start free.

Zendesk
5.0 on Zendesk Marketplace

Loved by support teams worldwide

See what support teams are saying about Macha AI.

The application seems excellent to me! We are still testing, and we need support for some details and they were extremely efficient too!

Daniela Costa

Daniela Costa

Head of Support, Seabra

Macha has been a great addition to our support toolkit. It generates clear, well-organized responses that fit naturally into our workflow. One feature we particularly appreciate is its ability to automatically reply in the same language as the ticket.

Marius F

Marius F

Support Head, Zentana

We've been using Macha for a little while now and it's been really great addition so far! It's powerful, convenient, and makes getting work done a lot easier for our agents.

Alexander Wedén

Alexander Wedén

Head of Support

Support team is very helpful and responsive. Really enjoy how lightweight this is within Zendesk itself vs other more intrusive tools.

Cathleen Wright

Cathleen Wright

Zendesk Admin, Cortex IO

So far it's pretty good! Our queries are a little nuanced, so we can't always use it, but it's got enough utility for us. It can even incorporate our bilingual country with greetings in a second language.

Jae Oliver

Jae Oliver

Head of Support, Wise

Really enjoying using Macha, it has made a noticeable difference to our support team in a short amount of time. I really like the ticket summary feature, saves us a lot of time.

Harry Jackson

Harry Jackson

Head of Support, Crumb

Macha AI is a great addition to my workspace! It's powerful, convenient, and it really makes productivity so much easier for our agents!

Dave G

Dave G

Head of Support, Cyber Power Systems

Very impressed! AI integration for Zendesk has certainly come a long way and Macha seems to set the standard for now. This will for sure save lot of time in our support team.

Pauli Juel

Pauli Juel

Head of CS, Dokument24

Macha has been working great for us so far! The auto-responses are accurate and our resolution time has dropped significantly.

Lana T

Lana T

Zendesk Admin, Swotzy

Macha AI is a great addition. The knowledge base feature means our agents always have the right answers at their fingertips.

Mischa Wolf

Mischa Wolf

Head of Support, Topi

We're enjoying this integration so far. It's made our support team more efficient and our customers get faster responses.

Paula G

Paula G

Head of Customer Support, Xly Studio

The team enjoys using it. It saves considerable time on common questions and the integration options are excellent.

Kilian Leister

Kilian Leister

Support Head, Didriksons

Ready to supercharge your team with AI?

Get started in minutes. Connect your tools, configure your agents, and let AI handle the rest.