Macha

Which AI Model Should Your Macha Agent Use? (2026)

Abbas, Customer Support & AI, Macha

Written by

Ankeet Guha, Co-founder & CTO, Macha

Reviewed by

Published June 12, 2026

Updated September 24, 2026

Each Macha agent runs on its own model, chosen from nine options, and the choice changes answer quality and speed but never the price. Start on the default, GPT-5.4, and move an agent only when a test run shows it needs something different.

Key takeaways

  • Macha sets the AI model per agent from the top-right of the configuration screen, with GPT-5.4 as the default and GPT-5.6 Terra as the strongest option.
  • The model an agent runs on changes quality and speed but not price, because Macha bills per ticket and charges each conversation once.
  • Macha retired Llama 3.3 70B, Llama 3.1 8B and Mixtral 8x7B on 28 August 2026 and replaced them with GPT OSS 120B and GPT OSS 20B.
  • Claude Sonnet 5 joined the Macha model picker on 26 August 2026, replacing Claude Sonnet 4, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 stays available.
  • A practical Macha rule: start agents on GPT-5.4, step up to GPT-5.6 Terra when a test shows missed nuance, and use Luna or GPT OSS where speed matters.
Which AI Model Should Your Macha Agent Use? (2026)

Pick the model per agent, from the top-right of the agent's configuration screen: new agents start on GPT-5.4, GPT-5.6 Terra is the strongest option, and lighter models like GPT-5.4 Mini or GPT OSS 20B suit simple, high-volume work. The choice changes quality and speed only. Macha bills per ticket, so every model costs the same.

Watch the 60-second guide

Which models can a Macha agent run on?

Nine models are in the picker as of September 2026:

ModelTierGood for
GPT-5.6 TerraFlagshipThe best answer on every ticket; sharper multi-step reasoning and tool selection
GPT-5.6 LunaMid-tierHigh-volume conversations; faster than Terra, a small step down in quality
GPT-5.4 (default)DefaultMost support work: triage, drafts, summaries, field updates
GPT-5Previous generationMulti-step agents with long instructions
GPT-5.4 MiniSimpleClassification, tagging and other short, repetitive jobs
Claude Sonnet 5 / Sonnet 4.5PremiumPremium reasoning and writing quality
GPT OSS 120B / GPT OSS 20BOpen, fastSimple, high-volume tasks where speed wins

The picker has changed twice recently. On 26 August 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 was added and Claude Sonnet 4 was retired. On 28 August Llama 3.3 70B, Llama 3.1 8B and Mixtral 8x7B were retired, and GPT OSS 120B and GPT OSS 20B took over the fast open-model role. Agents that were on a retired model move over on their next update. GPT-5.6 Terra and Luna arrived on 27 July 2026.

Where do you set an agent's model?

The model is a per-agent setting. Open an agent and pick its model from the top-right of the configuration screen. Because it's per agent, you can run your high-volume triage agent on a fast, lightweight model and reserve a stronger model for the one agent that genuinely needs deep reasoning. The model doesn't change what you pay. Macha bills per ticket, one conversation charged once, whichever model the agent runs on, so the choice is purely about quality and speed.

Set each agent’s model in its configuration — here GPT-5 chosen for a complex agent.
Set each agent’s model in its configuration. Here GPT-5 is chosen for a complex agent.

What changes between models, and what doesn't?

When you compare models, you're trading off two things, and a third no longer moves:

  • Quality: how well it handles nuance, long instructions and tricky reasoning.
  • Speed: how fast it responds, which matters for live chat and high volume.
  • Cost: not a variable. Macha bills per ticket, so the model an agent runs on doesn't change the price.

How do you match the model to the task?

A simple rule covers most cases:

  • Routine support work (classify, tag, summarize, draft a reply, update a field): GPT-5.4, the default. For pure classification at high volume, GPT-5.4 Mini or GPT-5.6 Luna is faster.
  • Complex agents with long, detailed instructions and many rules to remember: GPT-5.6 Terra. It's the step up when the default starts missing nuance.
  • The highest-stakes writing: Terra or Claude Sonnet 5. Use premium models on the one or two agents that truly need them.
  • Massive-volume, very simple tasks: the open GPT OSS models answer fastest, if quality holds.

How do you decide without guessing?

Don't agonize over it up front. Let the test run tell you:

  1. Start on the default, GPT-5.4. It's the right answer most of the time.
  2. Test the agent against real tickets. If the quality is good, you're done.
  3. If it misses nuance (misreads intent, fumbles long instructions), step up to GPT-5.6 Terra and test again.
  4. If it's slower than the job needs and quality holds, try Luna or Mini instead.

Start on the default, move only when a test shows you should, and you end up with the fastest model that still does the job, agent by agent.

Does model speed matter for live chat?

For anything customer-facing in real time, like a website chatbot or live chat, response speed matters as much as quality. The faster models (Luna, Mini, GPT OSS) feel snappier to a waiting visitor. A heavier model can be worth the wait for a back-of-house agent doing complex analysis where nobody's watching the clock.

Which model should each type of agent start on?

If you want a quick starting point instead of deciding from scratch:

AgentStart withWhy
Ticket triage / taggingGPT-5.4 MiniSimple classification, high volume
SummarizerGPT-5.4Straightforward, runs a lot
WISMO / order lookupGPT-5.4Fetch and format, not deep reasoning
Refund / policy agentGPT-5.6 TerraJudgment and rules to follow carefully
Complex multi-step resolverGPT-5.6 TerraLong instructions, real nuance
Live website chatbotGPT-5.6 Luna / GPT OSS (fast)Speed matters for a waiting visitor

The pattern: start on the default and move only the agents a test run says need something different.

Frequently asked questions

Where do I set an agent's model? On the agent's configuration screen, top-right. It's a per-agent setting.

Which model should most agents use? GPT-5.4, the default. It handles the bulk of support workflows well.

When should I use a stronger model? When an agent has long, complex instructions or needs deeper reasoning. Step up to GPT-5.6 Terra, or Claude Sonnet 5 for writing-heavy agents.

Can different agents use different models? Yes. Light and fast for high-volume agents, stronger for the few that need it.

Does the model change what I pay? No. Macha bills per ticket (one conversation, charged once, however many messages and tool calls it takes) whichever model the agent runs on. Plans start at $299 a month for 750 tickets. See how Macha pricing works.

What happened to Llama and Mixtral? They were retired from the picker on 28 August 2026 and replaced by GPT OSS 120B and GPT OSS 20B. Agents that used them move over on their next update.

Try it: build an agent, pick a model, and test it on real tickets. $50 of free usage, no credit card required. Start free.

Macha

About Macha

Macha is an AI agent platform that works on top of the help desk you already use (Zendesk, Freshdesk, Gorgias, Front, Intercom or HubSpot) and connects to the rest of your stack, even your own internal systems. It is done for you: the Macha team analyzes your past tickets, builds the knowledge base and the agents, and runs them in safe mode until the drafts are right. Pricing is about $0.40 a ticket, and that includes setup and a dedicated success manager who handles your changes. Learn more about Macha →

Zendesk
5.0 on Zendesk Marketplace

Loved by support teams worldwide

See what support teams are saying about Macha AI.

The application seems excellent to me! We are still testing, and we need support for some details and they were extremely efficient too!

Daniela Costa

Daniela Costa

Head of Support, Seabra

Macha has been a great addition to our support toolkit. It generates clear, well-organized responses that fit naturally into our workflow. One feature we particularly appreciate is its ability to automatically reply in the same language as the ticket.

Marius F

Marius F

Support Head, Zentana

We've been using Macha for a little while now and it's been really great addition so far! It's powerful, convenient, and makes getting work done a lot easier for our agents.

Alexander Wedén

Alexander Wedén

Head of Support

Support team is very helpful and responsive. Really enjoy how lightweight this is within Zendesk itself vs other more intrusive tools.

Cathleen Wright

Cathleen Wright

Zendesk Admin, Cortex IO

So far it's pretty good! Our queries are a little nuanced, so we can't always use it, but it's got enough utility for us. It can even incorporate our bilingual country with greetings in a second language.

Jae Oliver

Jae Oliver

Head of Support, Wise

Really enjoying using Macha, it has made a noticeable difference to our support team in a short amount of time. I really like the ticket summary feature, saves us a lot of time.

Harry Jackson

Harry Jackson

Head of Support, Crumb

Macha AI is a great addition to my workspace! It's powerful, convenient, and it really makes productivity so much easier for our agents!

Dave G

Dave G

Head of Support, Cyber Power Systems

Very impressed! AI integration for Zendesk has certainly come a long way and Macha seems to set the standard for now. This will for sure save lot of time in our support team.

Pauli Juel

Pauli Juel

Head of CS, Dokument24

Macha has been working great for us so far! The auto-responses are accurate and our resolution time has dropped significantly.

Lana T

Lana T

Zendesk Admin, Swotzy

Macha AI is a great addition. The knowledge base feature means our agents always have the right answers at their fingertips.

Mischa Wolf

Mischa Wolf

Head of Support, Topi

We're enjoying this integration so far. It's made our support team more efficient and our customers get faster responses.

Paula G

Paula G

Head of Customer Support, Xly Studio

The team enjoys using it. It saves considerable time on common questions and the integration options are excellent.

Kilian Leister

Kilian Leister

Support Head, Didriksons

Get your AI agents set up for you.

Book a 20-minute call with our team. We'll show you where we would start on your help desk and how the setup works. Setup and a dedicated success manager come with the trial and every plan.

Live in under a week
Safe mode until you approve
About $0.40 a ticket