Macha

Front Snooze, Reminders & Follow-Ups Explained (Never Drop a Thread)

Abbas, Customer Support & AI, Macha

Written by

Ankeet Guha, Co-founder & CTO, Macha

Reviewed by

Published July 16, 2026

Updated July 16, 2026

Every shared inbox has the same failure mode: a conversation gets read, mentally filed under "deal with later," and then quietly forgotten until the customer chases it or the deal goes cold. Front's follow-up system exists to make "later" a real, scheduled thing rather than a hope. It is built from a few overlapping features — snooze, reminders, Send and Snooze, and time-based rules — that together form a safety net so no thread slips through the cracks. This guide walks through each piece, how they fit together into a workflow, where the native tools stop, and how an AI layer picks up the part scheduling alone can't do: actually answering the follow-up when it resurfaces.

Front Snooze, Reminders & Follow-Ups Explained (Never Drop a Thread)

Snooze: make "later" a scheduled time

Snooze is the foundation. It sets a time for a conversation to reopen in your inbox exactly when you want it back — so you can clear a message off your plate now without losing it. Per Front's guide on snoozing conversations for later or follow-up, there are three ways to snooze a conversation:

  1. Click the clock icon at the top of an open conversation.
  2. Use the snooze quick action that appears when you hover over a conversation in your list.
  3. Use Send & Snooze in the composer when you reply (more on that below).

Whichever route you take, Front offers a snooze menu where you either pick from a list of preset times or set a custom Day & Time. The presets cover the intervals most teams reach for — later today, this evening, tomorrow, next week — and the custom option handles anything specific ("reopen this Thursday at 9am").

Front's Snooze / follow-up reminder menu open on a conversation, offering Later today, This evening, Tomorrow, This week, Next week and a custom 'Day & Time' - the follow-up system that resurfaces a conversation at a chosen time.
Front's Snooze / follow-up reminder menu open on a conversation, offering Later today, This evening, Tomorrow, This week, Next week and a custom 'Day & Time' - the follow-up system that resurfaces a conversation at a chosen time.

The behaviour that makes snooze safe for follow-ups is the auto-cancel: if a recipient replies before your snooze expires, the conversation reopens in your inbox and the snooze automatically cancels. You don't get a stale reminder for something that already resolved itself. And if you still want to keep tracking a thread after it reopens, the Snooze again until… action re-applies the same timing with one click.

You can find everything currently sleeping via the Snoozed tab in your conversation list, or by searching is:snoozed across the current or all inboxes. To wake one manually, click the active (orange) clock icon and choose Unsnooze.

Custom snooze times

If your team keeps reaching for the same non-standard intervals — "in 3 business days," "start of next quarter" — you don't have to keep building them by hand. Front lets you curate your own snooze menu with up to 34 custom snooze times. You create them from the gear icon → personal settings → Snoozes → Create snooze, and edit any existing option by clicking it. Once saved, they show up in the snooze menu everywhere you snooze, so a whole workflow's worth of timings is one tap away.

This is the small setup step most teams skip and later wish they hadn't: a shared vocabulary of snooze intervals ("chase in 48h," "quarterly check-in") makes the follow-up habit stick because the right timing is always right there.

Send & Snooze: the follow-up you set at reply time

The most useful moment to schedule a follow-up is the exact moment you send a reply — because that's when you know you're now waiting on the other person. Front's composer handles this directly. Per Front's sending options guide, clicking the dropdown arrow next to the Send button exposes several sending modes, including Send Later (scheduled send), Send & Archive, and Send & Snooze.

Send & Snooze "allows you to set a time for the conversation to reopen if your recipient does not reply." So the flow is: you answer the customer, pick a follow-up time, and the conversation disappears until then. If they write back first, the snooze auto-cancels and the thread reopens naturally. If they go quiet, it resurfaces on your chosen date and prompts you to chase — the classic "never forget to follow up" pattern, built into the send action itself.

That single button covers most one-off follow-ups. For anything recurring or team-wide, you graduate to rules.

Auto-follow-up rules: the safety net that runs itself

Snooze and Send & Snooze depend on a person remembering to set them. Rules remove that dependency. Front's automation engine supports delayed (time-based) rules that watch for conversations going stale and act automatically — the difference between a personal reminder and an inbox-wide SLA safety net.

The key ingredient is a time-based condition. Per Front's guidance on time-based / delayed rules, you can build a rule around a condition like Oldest message is unreplied after a set duration. A common auto-follow-up rule looks like this:

  • When: an outbound message is sent
  • If: the oldest message is still unreplied after 2 days
  • Then: reply with a "Follow up" template

Now every customer who goes quiet after your reply gets a polite nudge without anyone tracking it manually. For a full breakdown of the When/If/Then model these rules are built on, see Front rules explained.

One subtlety worth knowing: delayed-rule timers are not affected by snoozing. Front's docs give the example — if an email arrives at 9:00am and you snooze it for 30 minutes (so it reopens at 9:30), a one-hour delayed rule still fires at 10:00 if nobody has replied. The delay clock runs off the original event, not off when the conversation happens to be visible. That's usually what you want (an SLA shouldn't reset just because someone snoozed the thread), but it's a common source of "why did this rule fire early?" confusion.

Snooze vs Send & Snooze vs reminder rules — which to use

The four tools overlap, so here's the quick decision guide:

ToolBest forTriggered byScope
SnoozeClearing a thread now, seeing it laterYou, manually (clock / quick action)Just that conversation
Send & SnoozeFollowing up after you repliedYou, at send timeJust that conversation
Custom snooze timesReusing the same intervalsSetup once, reuse everywherePersonal menu
Auto-follow-up ruleTeam-wide "chase if unreplied" SLATime-based condition, automaticallyWhole inbox / workspace

Rule of thumb: use snooze / Send & Snooze for judgment-based, one-off follow-ups, and delayed rules for the guarantees you never want to depend on human memory. For scheduled multi-touch outreach (not just a single chase), Front's sequences are the dedicated tool.

Under the hood: the reminders API

If you're automating follow-ups from an external system, Front exposes snooze directly. Per the Front developer docs, you snooze or unsnooze a conversation with:

PATCH https://api2.frontapp.com/conversations/{conversation_id}/reminders
Authorization: Bearer <API_TOKEN>
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "teammate_id": "tea_55c8c149",
  "scheduled_at": 1775577600
}

A few specifics from the reference: scheduled_at is a Unix timestamp in seconds, must be in the future and within 50 years, and you set it to null to cancel a reminder. For private conversations the teammate_id must be the owner; for shared conversations it can be any teammate with inbox access. The endpoint needs the conversations:write scope. If you're new to Front's API, how to use the Front API covers auth and tokens first.

The honest limits — and where an AI layer picks up

Front's follow-up system is genuinely good at what it does, and it's worth crediting: snooze, Send & Snooze, custom timings, and delayed rules together mean a disciplined team really can stop dropping threads. That's a native strength, not a gap.

But every one of these tools is about timing, not answering. A snooze puts the conversation back in front of you; it doesn't know what to say. An auto-follow-up rule fires the same fixed template to everyone who trips the condition — "just checking in" — regardless of what the customer actually asked. When the thread resurfaces, a human still has to read the history, figure out the state, and write the real reply. And a few pieces sit behind plan tiers or the shared-inbox model: delayed rules and the deeper automation live in Front's paid rule tiers, and the collaborative benefits (a whole team seeing the same snoozed queue) assume you're on shared inboxes with teammates, not a solo seat. Front's own pricing lays out what unlocks where.

This is exactly the seam an AI agent layer fills — not by replacing Front's scheduler, but by handling the reasoning the scheduler structurally can't. The broader category of AI agents for customer service exists for the work a timer and a fixed template can't do. Macha is one such layer: it runs on top of the Front you already use through the live Macha–Front connector — it does not replace Front, your inboxes, your snoozes, or your rules. You keep Front doing the timing: snoozing, resurfacing, and enforcing the "chase after N days" safety net. Then when a follow-up reopens, Macha's agent reads the whole conversation, understands what's actually outstanding, and drafts or sends a grounded reply — pulling a real order or account status through a custom tool so the follow-up says something true, not "just checking in." Front reopens the thread on schedule; the agent turns that reopened thread into a resolved one. Macha's credits are consumed per AI action, never per resolution — scheduling and reasoning cost different amounts, and it's honest to price them separately.

The clean division of labour: let Front's follow-up system guarantee the thread comes back, and layer an agent on top so that when it does, there's a real answer waiting — not just a reminder. For how this fits the wider workspace, see the Front shared inbox model.

FAQ

How do I snooze a conversation in Front? Three ways: click the clock icon at the top of the open conversation, use the snooze quick action when you hover over a conversation in your list, or use Send & Snooze in the composer when you reply. Then pick a preset time or a custom Day & Time, and the conversation reopens in your inbox at that moment.

What happens if the customer replies before my snooze ends? The conversation reopens in your inbox immediately and the snooze auto-cancels, so you don't get a stale reminder. If you still want to keep tracking it, the "Snooze again until…" action re-applies the same timing with one click.

What's the difference between snooze and Send & Snooze? Plain snooze just reschedules when a conversation reappears. Send & Snooze does it as part of sending a reply — it sets a time for the conversation to reopen only if your recipient doesn't write back, which is the ideal follow-up trigger since you've just handed the ball to them.

Can Front follow up automatically without me remembering? Yes, with a delayed (time-based) rule. A rule like "when an outbound message is sent, if the oldest message is still unreplied after 2 days, reply with a Follow up template" chases stale threads inbox-wide with no manual tracking. Note that delayed-rule timers aren't paused by snoozing.

Can I add AI to Front's follow-ups without replacing Front? Yes. An AI agent layer like Macha connects to Front as a live connector and runs on top of your existing inboxes, snoozes, and rules — it doesn't replace them. Front keeps resurfacing threads on schedule; the agent reads the reopened conversation, understands what's still outstanding, and drafts or sends a grounded reply instead of a generic template.

Ready to turn "resurfaced" into "resolved"? Start a free trial of Macha and connect it to your Front in minutes.

Macha

About Macha

Macha is an AI agent platform that works on top of the help desk you already use — Zendesk, Freshdesk, Gorgias, or Front — and connects to the rest of your stack, even your own internal systems. Its AI agents resolve tickets and automate entire workflows end to end, all set up in plain English, no code. Learn more about Macha →

Zendesk
5.0 on Zendesk Marketplace

Loved by support teams worldwide

See what support teams are saying about Macha AI.

The application seems excellent to me! We are still testing, and we need support for some details and they were extremely efficient too!

Daniela Costa

Daniela Costa

Head of Support, Seabra

Macha has been a great addition to our support toolkit. It generates clear, well-organized responses that fit naturally into our workflow. One feature we particularly appreciate is its ability to automatically reply in the same language as the ticket.

Marius F

Marius F

Support Head, Zentana

We've been using Macha for a little while now and it's been really great addition so far! It's powerful, convenient, and makes getting work done a lot easier for our agents.

Alexander Wedén

Alexander Wedén

Head of Support

Support team is very helpful and responsive. Really enjoy how lightweight this is within Zendesk itself vs other more intrusive tools.

Cathleen Wright

Cathleen Wright

Zendesk Admin, Cortex IO

So far it's pretty good! Our queries are a little nuanced, so we can't always use it, but it's got enough utility for us. It can even incorporate our bilingual country with greetings in a second language.

Jae Oliver

Jae Oliver

Head of Support, Wise

Really enjoying using Macha, it has made a noticeable difference to our support team in a short amount of time. I really like the ticket summary feature, saves us a lot of time.

Harry Jackson

Harry Jackson

Head of Support, Crumb

Macha AI is a great addition to my workspace! It's powerful, convenient, and it really makes productivity so much easier for our agents!

Dave G

Dave G

Head of Support, Cyber Power Systems

Very impressed! AI integration for Zendesk has certainly come a long way and Macha seems to set the standard for now. This will for sure save lot of time in our support team.

Pauli Juel

Pauli Juel

Head of CS, Dokument24

Macha has been working great for us so far! The auto-responses are accurate and our resolution time has dropped significantly.

Lana T

Lana T

Zendesk Admin, Swotzy

Macha AI is a great addition. The knowledge base feature means our agents always have the right answers at their fingertips.

Mischa Wolf

Mischa Wolf

Head of Support, Topi

We're enjoying this integration so far. It's made our support team more efficient and our customers get faster responses.

Paula G

Paula G

Head of Customer Support, Xly Studio

The team enjoys using it. It saves considerable time on common questions and the integration options are excellent.

Kilian Leister

Kilian Leister

Support Head, Didriksons

Ready to supercharge your team with AI?

Get started in minutes. Connect your tools, configure your agents, and let AI handle the rest.

7-day free trial · no credit card required