Macha

What Is Teneo AI? Pricing, Verified Results and Alternatives (2026)

Abbas, Customer Support & AI, Macha

Written by

Ankeet Guha, Co-founder & CTO, Macha

Reviewed by

Published September 21, 2026

Updated October 6, 2026

Teneo AI is an enterprise voice AI platform for contact centers on Genesys Cloud and Amazon Connect, built so that only validated responses reach a caller. It publishes no pricing, and three of its headline customer results matched their case studies when we checked.

Key takeaways

  • Teneo AI is an enterprise voice AI platform for contact centers on Genesys Cloud and Amazon Connect, and teneo.ai publishes no pricing or self-serve trial.
  • Teneo's case studies confirm $6 million saved and 36,000 agent hours freed at Medtronic, and 9 million calls a year with an 18-point NPS rise at Swisscom.
  • Teneo's homepage claims over 17,000 AI agents in production, 99% intent accuracy and more than 86 languages, and a $32.4M monthly saving for one customer that no case study backs up.
  • FeaturedCustomers.com rates Teneo 4.7 out of 5.0 based on 3,556 reference ratings, though the individual testimonials sit behind an account wall.
  • For a ticket queue inside a help desk, Macha is the done-for-you option: the Macha team builds and runs the agent, included at about $0.40 a ticket with a dedicated success manager and no sales-led contract.
What Is Teneo AI? Pricing, Verified Results and Alternatives (2026)

Teneo AI is an enterprise voice AI platform for large contact centers running Genesys Cloud or Amazon Connect, and it doesn't publish a price: every path on teneo.ai ends at a "Contact" form. Its homepage banner reads "AI that doesn't guess. Ever," and its headline Medtronic result ($6 million saved, 36,000 agent hours freed) matches the underlying case study when you check it.

QuestionAnswer (checked 24 September 2026)
What it isEnterprise conversational AI for contact-center voice, plus chat, apps and email
Built onGenesys Cloud, Amazon Connect and similar CCaaS platforms
PriceUnpublished; teneo.ai/pricing returns a 404
Self-serve trialNone published
Scale claims17,000+ AI agents in production, 99% intent accuracy, 86+ languages
Verified case studiesMedtronic, Telefónica and Swisscom match the homepage figures
Rating4.7 out of 5.0 on FeaturedCustomers (3,556 reference ratings)

What is Teneo AI?

Teneo.ai's homepage: "Agentic AI Built for Enterprise Voice at Scale," with customer logos.
Teneo.ai's homepage: "Agentic AI Built for Enterprise Voice at Scale," with customer logos.

Teneo AI is an enterprise conversational AI platform focused on contact-center voice automation, built for organizations running Genesys Cloud, Amazon Connect, and similar CCaaS platforms. Its architecture keeps generative AI at arm's length from the customer: "only controlled responses reach your customers," with the platform describing itself as "LLM-independent by design," letting a customer choose how much generative AI to use, and which model, without getting locked into one provider. Teneo is a rebrand rather than a recent startup: the company was founded in Stockholm in 2001 as Artificial Solutions and traded on Nasdaq First North under the ticker ASAI before rebranding as Teneo.ai in August 2024.

The homepage reports 17,000-plus AI agents in production, 99% intent accuracy, support for 86-plus languages from a single instance, and named enterprise customers including Telefónica Germany, Swisscom and Medtronic. The homepage also claims automated calls cost $0.40 against $5.60 for a live agent; that is Teneo's own figure, with no methodology on the page.

Do Teneo's customer results hold up?

This category has produced more than one vendor whose homepage statistics don't match its own case studies once you check. Teneo is a useful contrast: we fetched the individual case studies behind three of its headline claims, and all three matched.

Teneo's Medtronic case study: $6M cost saved, 36,000 agent hours saved, -37% wait time.
Teneo's Medtronic case study: $6M cost saved, 36,000 agent hours saved, -37% wait time.

Medtronic's case study confirms the homepage's $6 million saved (in 2022) and 36,000 agent hours freed exactly, and adds detail beyond the homepage figure: cost per contact fell from $25.96 to under $12 in its Cardiovascular Group business unit, wait times dropped 37%, misrouted calls fell 55% (from 9% to 4%), and field reps in Cranial & Spinal got back 4-5 hours a week. Telefónica's case study confirms "almost one million voice-based requests per month," matching the homepage's "900,000+ monthly calls" closely, plus 200,000 monthly SMS and WhatsApp requests. Swisscom's case study confirms "9 million calls per year," matching the homepage's figure exactly, alongside an 18-point Net Promoter Score increase, across German, Italian, French and English.

We could not locate the specific case study behind the homepage's separate claim of "$32.4M monthly savings for one customer," a figure large enough that it's worth asking Teneo directly which customer and what methodology produced it before treating it as comparable to the three verified numbers above.

How does Teneo keep generative AI from reaching callers?

Teneo's core design choice is response validation before delivery, rather than raw model output reaching a caller directly. That's paired with omnichannel consistency across voice, chat, apps, and email, any-system integration via API, support for Model Context Protocol and Agent-to-Agent protocols (recent standards for how AI agents interoperate), and a low-code agent builder with public API access for engineering teams that want to build on top of the platform rather than only configure it through a UI.

Teneo's features diagram: open architecture, security, cost control, and scalability.
Teneo's features diagram: open architecture, security, cost control, and scalability.
Teneo's documentation site, showing the Teneo Platform reference guide in its sidebar.
Teneo's documentation site, showing the Teneo Platform reference guide in its sidebar.

What features does Teneo include?

  • Validated-response architecture: generative AI output is checked before it reaches a customer, aimed at eliminating hallucinated answers on high-volume voice traffic.
  • LLM-independent design: choose which model (or models) power the platform, without a hard dependency on one vendor.
  • Omnichannel: voice, chat, apps, and email from one platform.
  • Low-code agent builder with public API access for deeper customization.
  • MCP and Agent-to-Agent protocol support, positioning Teneo to interoperate with other agent systems as those standards mature.

How much does Teneo AI cost?

Teneo AI does not publish pricing. The pricing URL (teneo.ai/pricing) still returned a 404 on 24 September 2026, and every path leads to a "Contact" form. We have no reliable published number or third-party estimate to cite.

Medtronic's case study estimates $9-10 million in cumulative savings in its Cardiovascular Group business unit alone. At that scale it's reasonable to assume Teneo's enterprise contracts for a large voice deployment run to six or seven figures a year, but treat that as a directional assumption, not a quote. Budget for an enterprise sales and integration cycle typical of contact-center-scale voice AI.

The incentive worth naming: a custom, quote-per-deal model lets Teneo price each enterprise account against the specific savings it expects to deliver, which is easier to justify internally when the number is $6 million than when it's a flat rate card. Ask for the same kind of before/after modeling Medtronic's case study shows, applied to your own call volume, before agreeing to a number.

What do Teneo AI users say?

Teneo's G2 reviews page returned a 403 to direct access. FeaturedCustomers.com gave an accessible rating instead: 4.7 out of 5.0, based on 3,556 reference ratings, with 29 testimonials and 27 case studies listed on the profile, checked 24 September 2026.

The individual testimonial and case-study text on that page sits behind a "locked content" wall that requires a FeaturedCustomers account to read, so we could not independently verify specific reviewer quotes beyond the aggregate score itself. Treat the 4.7/5.0 figure as a real, checkable data point, and ask Teneo directly for a customer reference call rather than relying on a quote you can't read in full.

What are Teneo AI's pros and cons?

Pros

  • Verified case-study results: three of three homepage customer statistics we checked (Medtronic, Telefónica, Swisscom) matched their individual case studies closely.
  • A specific, checkable architecture claim (validated responses, no raw LLM output reaching customers) rather than a vague safety promise.
  • LLM-independent design avoids locking a large voice deployment to one model provider.
  • 4.7/5.0 on FeaturedCustomers, based on 3,556 reference ratings, a large sample for this category.

Cons

  • No published pricing, and no reliable third-party estimate exists.
  • One prominent homepage statistic ($32.4M in monthly savings) has no case study we could locate to verify it, unlike the platform's other headline numbers.
  • No accessible G2 review page at the time of writing.
  • Built for large-scale voice deployments on Genesys Cloud or Amazon Connect; a small team without that CCaaS infrastructure gets less benefit from the platform's core positioning.

Who is Teneo AI best for?

Teneo fits teams at a large enterprise running high call volume through Genesys Cloud or Amazon Connect, where a validated, no-hallucination response is a hard requirement: healthcare (Medtronic), telecom (Telefónica, Swisscom), and similarly regulated or high-stakes industries. The verified case studies all describe multi-year, multi-million-dollar deployments at meaningful scale.

It's the wrong choice for a team that wants to see a price before a sales call, or one that doesn't run a CCaaS platform Teneo is built to integrate with. A 15-person support team on a single help desk gets little from a platform built and priced around enterprise voice infrastructure.

How does Teneo AI compare with Kore.ai and Macha?

Kore.ai's homepage, "AI Agents proven to deliver your outcomes," with customer logos.
Kore.ai's homepage, "AI Agents proven to deliver your outcomes," with customer logos.

The closest comparison is Kore.ai, another enterprise conversational AI platform serving similarly large, regulated organizations. Kore.ai also publishes no pricing page (kore.ai/pricing returned a 404 on 24 September 2026), consistent with enterprise, sales-led software in this category.

Teneo AIKore.aiMacha
ModelEnterprise voice AI with validated-response architectureBroad enterprise conversational AI across industriesAI agent layer on your existing help desk
Best forLarge contact centers on Genesys Cloud or Amazon ConnectEnterprise contact centers across many verticalsTeams on Zendesk, Freshdesk, Gorgias, Front, HubSpot, Intercom
PricingUnpublished, sales-ledUnpublished, sales-ledFrom $299/mo for 750 tickets (~$0.40/ticket), published
Verified customer resultsMedtronic, Telefónica, and Swisscom case studies matched homepage claimsNot independently verified for this guideN/A (newer platform)
Self-serve trialNoNo$50 free usage
Replaces your help desk?No, voice-first for contact centersNo, layers onto an existing CCaaS/CRM stackNo, sits on top of Zendesk, Freshdesk, Gorgias, Front, HubSpot or Intercom

Both Teneo and Kore.ai compete for the same large enterprise voice buyer. For our detailed take on Kore.ai specifically, see our guide to Kore.ai. Neither vendor reaches a support team's ticket queue inside a help desk; that's where Macha fits instead, as an AI agent layer inside Zendesk, Freshdesk, Gorgias, Front, HubSpot or Intercom with published per-ticket pricing and a self-serve trial. It's done for you: the Macha team analyzes your past tickets, builds the knowledge base and the agent on your help desk, and runs it in safe mode until the drafts are right. That's included at about $0.40 a ticket, along with a dedicated success manager who handles your changes, with no enterprise contract. For more on how enterprise voice AI compares to ticket-based agents, see our guide to AI agents for customer service.

How we researched this

We fetched Teneo.ai's homepage, features page, Teneo 8 launch page, and its Medtronic, Telefónica, and Swisscom case studies directly on 2026-09-17, using its sitemap to find real case-study URLs, specifically to check the homepage's headline customer statistics against each underlying case study. All three matched closely. We re-checked the homepage, the Medtronic and Swisscom case studies, the pricing URL and the FeaturedCustomers profile on 24 September 2026. We could not locate a case study for the separate "$32.4M monthly savings" claim. G2 returned a 403; FeaturedCustomers.com gave an accessible aggregate rating (4.7/5.0 based on 3,556 reference ratings), though the individual testimonial and case-study text on that page is locked behind an account wall, so we're not citing specific reviewer quotes from it. Kore.ai's homepage (captured previously for its own guide) is reused here for the comparison.

FAQ

What is Teneo AI? Teneo AI is an enterprise conversational AI platform for contact-center voice automation, built around a validated-response architecture that keeps raw generative AI output from reaching customers directly, integrating with Genesys Cloud and Amazon Connect.

How much does Teneo AI cost? Teneo doesn't publish pricing, and its pricing URL returns a 404. There's no reliable third-party estimate; budget for an enterprise sales and integration cycle typical of contact-center-scale voice AI.

Are Teneo AI's customer results verified? The three we checked directly, Medtronic, Telefónica, and Swisscom, matched their homepage figures closely. A separate "$32.4M monthly savings" claim has no case study we could locate to verify it.

Is there a free trial? No self-serve trial is published. Every path on the site leads to a "Contact" form.

What do real users say about Teneo AI? FeaturedCustomers.com shows a 4.7/5.0 rating based on 3,556 reference ratings, checked 24 September 2026, across 29 testimonials and 27 case studies. The individual quote text on that page is locked behind an account wall, so treat the aggregate score as the verifiable data point and ask Teneo for a direct customer reference.

Was Teneo AI previously called something else? Yes. Teneo.ai was founded in Stockholm in 2001 as Artificial Solutions, traded publicly on Nasdaq First North under the ticker ASAI, and rebranded as Teneo.ai in August 2024.

What are good alternatives to Teneo AI? Kore.ai is the closest comparison: another enterprise conversational AI platform with unpublished, sales-led pricing serving similar large organizations. For a team running a single help desk instead of enterprise voice infrastructure, a lighter, help-desk-native AI agent is a better fit than either vendor.

Does Teneo AI replace a help desk? No. It's built for voice-first contact-center automation on top of platforms like Genesys Cloud and Amazon Connect. It isn't a general-purpose ticket queue for a single support inbox.


Ready to automate the ticket queue with published, per-ticket pricing instead of a sales-led enterprise contract? See how Macha's pricing works or start a trial on top of the help desk you already run.

Sources: Teneo.ai, Teneo features, Teneo 8 launch, Medtronic case study, Telefónica case study, Swisscom case study, FeaturedCustomers: Teneo AI reviews, Kore.ai.

Macha

About Macha

Macha is an AI agent platform that works on top of the help desk you already use (Zendesk, Freshdesk, Gorgias, Front, Intercom or HubSpot) and connects to the rest of your stack, even your own internal systems. It is done for you: the Macha team analyzes your past tickets, builds the knowledge base and the agents, and runs them in safe mode until the drafts are right. Pricing is about $0.40 a ticket, and that includes setup and a dedicated success manager who handles your changes. Learn more about Macha →

Zendesk
5.0 on Zendesk Marketplace

Loved by support teams worldwide

See what support teams are saying about Macha AI.

The application seems excellent to me! We are still testing, and we need support for some details and they were extremely efficient too!

Daniela Costa

Daniela Costa

Head of Support, Seabra

Macha has been a great addition to our support toolkit. It generates clear, well-organized responses that fit naturally into our workflow. One feature we particularly appreciate is its ability to automatically reply in the same language as the ticket.

Marius F

Marius F

Support Head, Zentana

We've been using Macha for a little while now and it's been really great addition so far! It's powerful, convenient, and makes getting work done a lot easier for our agents.

Alexander Wedén

Alexander Wedén

Head of Support

Support team is very helpful and responsive. Really enjoy how lightweight this is within Zendesk itself vs other more intrusive tools.

Cathleen Wright

Cathleen Wright

Zendesk Admin, Cortex IO

So far it's pretty good! Our queries are a little nuanced, so we can't always use it, but it's got enough utility for us. It can even incorporate our bilingual country with greetings in a second language.

Jae Oliver

Jae Oliver

Head of Support, Wise

Really enjoying using Macha, it has made a noticeable difference to our support team in a short amount of time. I really like the ticket summary feature, saves us a lot of time.

Harry Jackson

Harry Jackson

Head of Support, Crumb

Macha AI is a great addition to my workspace! It's powerful, convenient, and it really makes productivity so much easier for our agents!

Dave G

Dave G

Head of Support, Cyber Power Systems

Very impressed! AI integration for Zendesk has certainly come a long way and Macha seems to set the standard for now. This will for sure save lot of time in our support team.

Pauli Juel

Pauli Juel

Head of CS, Dokument24

Macha has been working great for us so far! The auto-responses are accurate and our resolution time has dropped significantly.

Lana T

Lana T

Zendesk Admin, Swotzy

Macha AI is a great addition. The knowledge base feature means our agents always have the right answers at their fingertips.

Mischa Wolf

Mischa Wolf

Head of Support, Topi

We're enjoying this integration so far. It's made our support team more efficient and our customers get faster responses.

Paula G

Paula G

Head of Customer Support, Xly Studio

The team enjoys using it. It saves considerable time on common questions and the integration options are excellent.

Kilian Leister

Kilian Leister

Support Head, Didriksons

Get your AI agents set up for you.

Book a 30-minute call with our team. We'll show you where we would start on your help desk and how the setup works. Setup and a dedicated success manager come with the trial and every plan.

Live in under a week
Safe mode until you approve
About $0.40 a ticket