Macha
AI Support & Agents

Deflection vs Resolution

定義

Deflection vs resolution is the distinction between preventing a ticket from reaching a human (deflection) and actually solving the customer's problem (resolution) — two outcomes that are easy to confuse but measure very different things.

別名: deflection versus resolutiondeflection and resolution

How they differ

Deflection counts interactions that never reach a human — the customer got an answer from a help center or bot, or simply didn't open a ticket. Resolution counts problems that were genuinely solved, whether by AI, self-service, or a person. A ticket can be deflected without being resolved: if a frustrated customer gives up, that's a deflection but not a resolution.

Good automation aims for both — but resolution is the honest measure of whether the customer's need was actually met.

Why it matters for support

Deflection is easy to inflate and easy to misread as success, because it only measures avoidance. Pairing it with resolution rate and CSAT keeps you honest: you want tickets solved, not just kept away from your team. This is also why outcome-based pricing gets contentious — vendors define "resolution" differently, so what counts as a billable win varies.

  • Deflection: ticket never reached a human
  • Resolution: the customer's problem was actually solved
  • A deflected ticket isn't necessarily a resolved one

よくある質問

Is deflection the same as resolution?

No. Deflection means a ticket didn't reach a human; resolution means the problem was solved. A customer who gives up is deflected but not resolved, which is why the two should be measured together.

Which metric should I optimize?

Resolution rate and CSAT are the truer measures of success. Use deflection as a workload indicator, but don't treat it as proof that customers were actually helped.

アイデアを実装に

Macha は既に運用中のヘルプデスク (Zendesk、Freshdesk、Front、Intercom、Gorgias) の上に載る AI エージェント層です。

トライアルを開始